A doctoral thesis at Linköping University exposes that nepotism might be an ignored concern in Sweden, with people having a 2-4% increased opportunity of obtaining jobs or housing if their family members hold essential public positions. The researcher suggests that transparency, awareness training, and enhanced treatments might mitigate corruption risks and keep residents confidence in public agencies.
A doctoral thesis carried out at Linköping University on corruption in a mature democracy highlights the threat of individuals gaining an advantage by having their relatives in significant positions within the general public sector. The research study reveals that nepotism might be a more considerable concern in Sweden than formerly believed and warrants increased attention.
Sweden is frequently considered as a country with a low level of corruption, which holds true when looking at, for example, its reasonably low number of convictions for bribery.
Critics claim that the degree of corruption may still be undervalued, as rankings might miss kinds of corruption that are harder to identify and have a less obvious effect on individualss daily lives. One example of this is when political leaders or public officials make choices that unlawfully benefit their relatives or friends, i.e., what is referred to as nepotism or friendship corruption.
People might vary in backgrounds, drives, choices, and understanding about how society functions, and this might affect the results. To weed out such factors, Emanuel Wittberg has actually compared people who are comparable but some of whom have others and contacts do not.
There is a threat that corruption may wear down people self-confidence in public agencies. Emanuel Wittberg states that what is special about his thesis is not only that it investigates corruption in a mature democracy however also the technique used: analysis of large-scale information. According to him, the outcomes are a first step towards getting an idea of the threat of large-scale nepotism.
To investigate this, Emanuel Wittberg, in his doctoral thesis, has actually evaluated records information for the entire Swedish population, relating to for instance work environment, educational level, and household relationships.
The results reveal that people whose moms and dads or siblings work for public agencies or public property managers have a higher chance of getting a job or a flat. There are also signs that local services might be preferred in public procurements.
Emanuel Wittberg, doctoral trainee at the Institute for Analytical Sociology and the Centre for Local Government Studies at Linköping University, Sweden. Credit: Jonas Roslund
” Both when it pertains to real estate owned by any provided community property manager and tasks in any offered town or government agency, were discussing a 2 to 4 percent increased opportunity,” says Emanuel Wittberg, a doctoral trainee at the Institute for Analytical Sociology and the Centre for Local Government Studies at Linköping University.
According to Emanuel Wittberg, this difference is statistically significant.
There might of course be lots of descriptions for this besides nepotism. People might vary in backgrounds, drives, preferences, and understanding about how society functions, and this might impact the results. To weed out such elements, Emanuel Wittberg has compared people who are similar but a few of whom have contacts and others do not.
In spite of this, it is not possible to eliminate unpredictability, as the records information do not consist of all info. He, for that reason, mentions that the results show where there may be a danger of nepotism, although it is not possible to determine that nepotism is associated with each individual case.
” My thesis suggests that this is an issue that is pertinent to study and keep your eyes on, likewise in a mature democracy like Sweden.”
There is a danger that corruption may deteriorate residents self-confidence in public firms. In Emanuel Wittbergs viewpoint, this can be prevented by making sure openness, so that decisions can be evaluated. There may also be a need for more awareness training and much better treatments, such as anonymizing job applications to a higher level.
Emanuel Wittberg says that what is unique about his thesis is not just that it investigates corruption in a mature democracy but likewise the method utilized: analysis of large-scale data. His examination consists of numerous people, organizations, and businesses, examined over a long period of time. According to him, the outcomes are an initial step towards getting an idea of the threat of large-scale nepotism.
Recommendation: “Corruption threats in a fully grown democracy: Mechanisms of social benefit and danger zones for corruption” by Emanuel Wittberg, 13 February 2023, Linköping University Electronic Press.DOI: 10.3384/ 9789180750073.
