At the very same time, from 1600-1700, the share of the male labor force included in items production increased by 50% to just under half of working guys (28% to 42%). Industries of fabrics, or metalworkers making nails and scythes, were shaped like “factories without devices spread out over hundreds of households” according to Shaw-Taylor– and progressively produced items for international markets.In Gloucestershire, for example, expansions in fabrics, footwear, and metals saw the share of the male workforce in the market grew from a third (33%) to almost half (48%) over the 17th century.While in Lancashire, the share of men in manufacturing work grew from 42% in 1660 to 61% in 1750, driven by a doubling of fabric employees (from 15% to 30%). Over 40% of ladies in Bradford aged 11-12 were likewise working in 1851, but this had fallen to nearer 10% by 1911, by which time legislation had developed a system of required education for young children.The Economies Past site is the result of a research project at Cambridge thats been running for over 20 years, the Occupational Structure of Britain 1379-1911, which has collected information from late middle ages survey tax records to early modern-day coroner reports.The main source of information from 1600-1800 comes from over two million wills and probate stocks: a list of the moveable products of the deceased.
Factories without machinesAs much of Europe continued to languish in subsistence farming, the number of male farming employees in Britain fell by over a third (64% to 42%) from 1600-1740. At the exact same time, from 1600-1700, the share of the male labor force included in items production increased by 50% to just under half of working males (28% to 42%). Industries of fabrics, or metalworkers making nails and scythes, were formed like “factories without makers spread out over hundreds of homes” according to Shaw-Taylor– and progressively produced products for global markets.In Gloucestershire, for example, growths in textiles, footwear, and metals saw the share of the male workforce in the market grew from a 3rd (33%) to almost half (48%) over the 17th century.While in Lancashire, the share of guys in making work grew from 42% in 1660 to 61% in 1750, driven by a doubling of textile workers (from 15% to 30%).”We believe labor force participation for adult females was somewhere in between 60-80% of in 1760, and back down to 43% by 1851,” stated Shaw-Taylor. Over 40% of ladies in Bradford aged 11-12 were likewise working in 1851, however this had actually fallen to nearer 10% by 1911, by which time legislation had actually created a system of mandatory education for young children.The Economies Past website is the outcome of a research job at Cambridge thats been running for over 20 years, the Occupational Structure of Britain 1379-1911, which has collected data from late middle ages survey tax records to early contemporary coroner reports.The main source of data from 1600-1800 comes from over 2 million wills and probate stocks: a list of the moveable items of the deceased.
