November 22, 2024

Devastating Hurricane Changes “Rules of the Game” in Monkey Society

Devastating Hurricane Changes “Rules Of The Game” In Monkey SocietyMacaques in the Shade on Cayo Santiago - Devastating Hurricane Changes “Rules Of The Game” In Monkey Society
Macaques in the shade on Cayo Santiago. Credit: Lauren Brent

A new study explores how Hurricane Maria’s devastation led to significant changes in the social behavior of rhesus macaques on Puerto Rico’s Monkey Island. By destroying much of their habitat, the hurricane created a situation where macaques that were more tolerant and less aggressive had a survival advantage due to their increased ability to share scarce resources like shade.

New research reveals that a devastating hurricane transformed a monkey society by shifting the balance of advantages and disadvantages in social interactions.

Hurricane Maria hit Puerto Rico in 2017, killing more than 3,000 people. It also destroyed 63% of vegetation on Cayo Santiago (also known as Monkey Island), which is home to a population of rhesus macaques.

Even now, tree cover remains far below pre-hurricane levels and – in this hot part of the world – that makes shade a scarce and precious resource for the macaques.

The new study, led by the universities of Pennsylvania and Exeter and published in the journal Science, shows the storm damage altered the evolutionary benefits of tolerating others and sharing shade – giving a survival advantage to tolerant macaques.

With many ecosystems changing rapidly due to human activity, this study is an example of a species adapting its social strategy to survive.

Impact on Macaque Behavior

“In response to the drastic changes caused by the hurricane, macaques persistently increased tolerance and decreased aggression towards each other,” said Dr Camille Testard, from the University of Pennsylvania.

“This enabled more macaques to access scarce shade, which is critical for survival.”

Dr Testard added: “We examined 10 years of data on the strength and number of macaques’ social ties, before and after the hurricane. Before the hurricane, tolerating others had no impact on the risk of death. Afterward, macaques that displayed more than average social tolerance – and were, therefore, better able to share shade – were 42% less likely to die than those that were less tolerant.”

This represents a sudden change in “selection pressure” – the evolutionary benefits or costs of different traits or behaviors.

Social behavior was assessed by recording aggression and how often individuals were seen sitting together.

Broader Implications and Conclusion

“Macaques aren’t the best at sharing resources – be they food or shade. They are well known to live in an aggressive, highly competitive society,” said Professor Lauren Brent, from the University of Exeter.

“But in the heat caused by ecological changes, often around 40C, the macaques had to share space or die.”

Dr Testard added: “To access shade, they need to tolerate – and be tolerated by – others, and we found that this tolerance spills over into other daily interactions. Macaques that began sharing shade also spend time together in the mornings, before the day’s heat forces them to seek shade. In effect, the hurricane changed the rules of the game in the monkeys’ society.”

Professor Brent added: “For group-living animals, social relationships may allow them to cope with disturbances in the environment, including human-induced climate change. We were surprised the macaques’ social behavior was so flexible, making them resilient to this environmental change, but some species may not display this same flexibility.”

Reference: “Ecological disturbance alters the adaptive benefits of social ties” by C. Testard, C. Shergold, A. Acevedo-Ithier, J. Hart, A. Bernau, J. E. Negron-Del Valle, D. Phillips, M. M. Watowich, J. I. Sanguinetti-Scheck, M. J. Montague, N. Snyder-Mackler, J. P. Higham, M. L. Platt and L. J. N. Brent, 20 June 2024, Science.
DOI: 10.1126/science.adk0606

The research team included Arizona State University and New York University.

Funders included the National Institutes of Health, the European Research Council, the National Science Foundation, and the Royal Society.