Tomatoes grown in the soil of open-air city plots had a lower carbon intensity than tomatoes grown in traditional greenhouses, while the emissions distinction in between standard and metropolitan agriculture vanished for air-freighted crops like asparagus.University of Michigan scientists examine a metropolitan garden in Detroit. It used data from 73 city farms and gardens in five nations and is the largest published research study to compare the carbon footprints of conventional and metropolitan agriculture.Three types of metropolitan agriculture sites were analyzed: urban farms (professionally handled and focused on food production), private gardens (little plots handled by single garden enthusiasts), and cumulative gardens (communal areas handled by groups of gardeners).”For example, conventional farms typically grow a single crop with the help of pesticides and fertilizers, resulting in larger harvests and a decreased carbon footprint when compared to metropolitan farms, he said.Best Practices for Sustainable Urban FarmingThe researchers determined 3 finest practices important to making low-tech urban agriculture more carbon-competitive with standard agriculture: Extend infrastructure lifetimes.
Tomatoes grown in the soil of outdoor metropolitan plots had a lower carbon intensity than tomatoes grown in traditional greenhouses, while the emissions distinction in between conventional and urban farming disappeared for air-freighted crops like asparagus.University of Michigan scientists evaluate an urban garden in Detroit. Credit: Dave Brenner, University of MichiganOptimizing Urban Agriculture for Climate Benefits”The exceptions exposed by our study suggest that urban agriculture specialists can decrease their climate effects by cultivating crops that are air-freighted or generally greenhouse-grown, in addition to making changes in site design and management,” stated study co-lead author Jason Hawes, a doctoral student at U-Ms School for Environment and Sustainability. By some price quotes, in between 20% and 30% of the global urban population engages in some type of urban agriculture.Despite strong evidence of the dietary and social advantages of metropolitan agriculture, its carbon footprint remains understudied. It used data from 73 metropolitan farms and gardens in 5 countries and is the largest released research study to compare the carbon footprints of standard and metropolitan agriculture.Three types of city agriculture sites were examined: metropolitan farms (professionally managed and focused on food production), private gardens (small plots handled by single garden enthusiasts), and collective gardens (common areas handled by groups of garden enthusiasts).”For example, traditional farms often grow a single crop with the help of fertilizers and pesticides, resulting in bigger harvests and a decreased carbon footprint when compared to metropolitan farms, he said.Best Practices for Sustainable Urban FarmingThe researchers determined three finest practices essential to making low-tech city agriculture more carbon-competitive with traditional farming: Extend infrastructure lifetimes.