September 19, 2024

Matter vs. Antimatter: New CERN Experiment Challenges Conventional Physics

Matter Vs. Antimatter: New CERN Experiment Challenges Conventional PhysicsMatter Antimatter Particles - Matter Vs. Antimatter: New CERN Experiment Challenges Conventional Physics

The BASE collaboration at CERN has developed a new method to cool antiprotons more rapidly, enabling more precise measurements of their mass and magnetic moment. This breakthrough may help uncover asymmetries between matter and antimatter, challenging the current standard model of particle physics.

The BASE team at CERN has enhanced antiproton cooling techniques, allowing quicker and more precise measurements that challenge existing theories of matter-antimatter symmetry, potentially reshaping our understanding of the universe’s composition.

Why does the universe contain matter and virtually no antimatter? The BASE international research collaboration at the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Geneva, led by Professor Dr. Stefan Ulmer from Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (HHU), has made a significant experimental breakthrough in addressing this question. They have developed a method to measure the mass and magnetic moment of antiprotons with unprecedented precision, which may help uncover possible asymmetries between matter and antimatter. The team at BASE has designed a trap that can cool individual antiprotons much faster than previously possible, as reported in the scientific journal Physical Review Letters.

After the Big Bang more than 13 billion years ago, the universe was full of high-energy radiation, which constantly generated pairs of matter and antimatter particles such as protons and antiprotons. When such a pair collides, the particles are annihilated and converted into pure energy again. So, all in all, exactly the same quantities of matter and antimatter should be generated and annihilated again, meaning that the universe should be largely matterless as a consequence.

Maxwell’s Daemon Cooling Double Trap - Matter Vs. Antimatter: New CERN Experiment Challenges Conventional PhysicsMaxwell’s Daemon Cooling Double Trap - Matter Vs. Antimatter: New CERN Experiment Challenges Conventional Physics

The “Maxwell‘s daemon cooling double trap,” which was developed by the BASE collaboration. It can be used to cool antiprotons very quickly to temperatures that are necessary for high-precision measurements. Credit: BASE-Collaboration / Stefan Ulmer

However, there is clearly an imbalance – an asymmetry – as material objects do exist. A minuscule amount more matter than antimatter has been generated – which contradicts the standard model of particle physics. Physicists have therefore been seeking to expand the standard model for decades. To this end, they also need extremely precise measurements of fundamental physical parameters.

The Role of the BASE Collaboration

This is the starting point for the BASE collaboration (“Baryon Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment”). It involves the universities in Düsseldorf, Hanover, Heidelberg, Mainz and Tokyo, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich and the research facilities at CERN in Geneva, the GSI Helmholtz Centre in Darmstadt, the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg, the National Metrology Institute of Germany (PTB) in Braunschweig and RIKEN in Wako/Japan.

“The central question we are seeking to answer is: Do matter particles and their corresponding antimatter particles weigh exactly the same and do they have exactly the same magnetic moments, or are there minuscule differences?” explains Professor Stefan Ulmer, spokesperson of BASE. He is a professor at the Institute for Experimental Physics at HHU and also conducts research at CERN and RIKEN.

The physicists want to take extremely high-resolution measurements of the so-called spin-flip – quantum transitions of the proton spin – for individual, ultra-cold, and thus extremely low-energy antiprotons; i.e. the change in orientation of the spin of the proton. “From the measured transition frequencies, we can, among other things, determine the magnetic moment of the antiprotons – their minute internal bar magnets, so to speak,” explains Ulmer, adding: “The aim is to see with an unprecedented level of accuracy whether these bar magnets in protons and antiprotons have the same strength.”

Antiproton Spin Transitions - Matter Vs. Antimatter: New CERN Experiment Challenges Conventional PhysicsAntiproton Spin Transitions - Matter Vs. Antimatter: New CERN Experiment Challenges Conventional Physics

The trap can be used to measure antiproton spin transitions with the highest accuracy. Credit: BASE-Collaboration / Barbara Maria Latacz

Preparing individual antiprotons for the measurements in a way that enables such levels of accuracy to be achieved is an extremely time-consuming experimental task. The BASE collaboration has now taken a decisive step forward in this regard.

Dr. Barbara Maria Latacz from CERN and lead author of the study that has now been published as an “editor’s suggestion” in Physical Review Letters, says: “We need antiprotons with a maximum temperature of 200 mK, i.e. extremely cold particles. This is the only way to differentiate between various spin quantum states. With previous techniques, it took 15 hours to cool antiprotons, which we obtained from the CERN accelerator complex, to this temperature. Our new cooling method shortens this period to eight minutes.”

The researchers achieved this by combining two so-called Penning traps into a single device, a “Maxwell’s daemon cooling double trap”. This trap makes it possible to prepare solely the coldest antiprotons on a targeted basis and use them for the subsequent spin-flip measurement; warmer particles are rejected. This eliminates the time needed to cool the warmer antiprotons.

The significantly shorter cooling time is needed to obtain the required measurement statistics in a significantly shorter period of time so that measuring uncertainties can be reduced further. Latacz: “We need at least 1,000 individual measurement cycles. With our new trap, we need a measurement time of around one month for this – compared with almost ten years using the old technique, which would be impossible to realize experimentally.”

Ulmer: “With the BASE trap, we have already been able to measure that the magnetic moments of protons and antiprotons differ by max. one billionth – we are talking about 10-9. We have been able to improve the error rate of the spin identification by more than a factor of 1,000. In the next measurement campaign, we are hoping to improve magnetic moment accuracy to 10-10.”

Professor Ulmer on plans for the future: “We want to construct a mobile particle trap, which we can use to transport antiprotons generated at CERN in Geneva to a new laboratory at HHU. This is set up in such a way that we can hope to improve the accuracy of measurements by at least a further factor of 10.”

Background: Traps for fundamental particles

Traps can store individual electrically charged fundamental particles, their antiparticles, or even atomic nuclei for long periods of time using magnetic and electric fields. Storage periods of over ten years are possible. Targeted particle measurements can then be made in the traps.

There are two basic types of construction: So-called Paul traps (developed by the German physicist Wolfgang Paul in the 1950s) use alternating electric fields to hold particles. The “Penning traps” developed by Hans G. Dehmelt use a homogeneous magnetic field and an electrostatic quadrupole field. Both physicists received the Nobel Prize for their developments in 1989.

Reference: “Orders of Magnitude Improved Cyclotron-Mode Cooling for Nondestructive Spin Quantum Transition Spectroscopy with Single Trapped Antiprotons” by BASE Collaboration, B. M. Latacz, M. Fleck, J. I. Jäger, G. Umbrazunas, B. P. Arndt, S. R. Erlewein, E. J. Wursten, J. A. Devlin, P. Micke, F. Abbass, D. Schweitzer, M. Wiesinger, C. Will, H. Yildiz, K. Blaum, Y. Matsuda, A. Mooser, C. Ospelkaus, C. Smorra, A. Soter, W. Quint, J. Walz, Y. Yamazaki and S. Ulmer, 1 August 2024, Physical Review Letters.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.053201