May 3, 2024

Highway Delays Can Cause Economic Losses of Up to $250 Million in a Single Day

Researchers examine the financial expense of disturbances to a vital transportation network in Virginia, consisting of a cyclone evacuation.
The shutdown of the Colonial gas pipeline in May 2021 had a dreadful influence on lots of sectors of the U.S. economy, especially those based on the countrys transport facilities. The event was a caution that the failure of one vital facilities has a ripple effect on others, causing often severe human and financial repercussions.

To help policymakers in mitigating the effects of infrastructure failures due to catastrophes like extreme storms and cyberattacks, Unal Tatar of the University of Albanys College of Emergency Preparedness, Homeland Security and Cybersecurity, and his coworkers Joost Santos and Shital Thekdi have developed a technique for determining the financial losses caused by interruptions of differing lengths and intensity to a critical infrastructure. Their study, “Economic Risk for physical system disturbances: a case of transportation systems,” is among several on facilities resilience that existed during the 2021 Society for Risk Analysis Virtual Annual Meeting, December 5-9.
The scientists analysis of a highway transportation network in Virginia indicates that the losses experienced in a single day from interruptions can range from $8 million to $256 million, depending on the length and severity of the event.
Since of the interconnections in between facilities (such as communication, energy, and transportation), scientists are increasingly modeling vital facilities systems as computer networks. When one node in the network is interrupted, it impacts the entire system. For their analysis, Tatar and his colleagues incorporated Functional Dependency Network Analysis (FDNA) with Dynamic Inoperability Input-Output Models (DIIM) to evaluate the extent to which interruptions to crucial infrastructure could deteriorate its functionality over an amount of time.
They evaluated their brand-new structure on a vital highway transport network in Virginia, considering 3 different situations of interruptions:

Mild, relatively regular, traffic conditions (a 3-hour disturbance).
Severe, however irregular, traffic conditions (a 6-hour disruption).
Severe, however less regular events– such as evacuation throughout and after a cyclone (a 1-2 day interruption).

Each situation produces a different level of inoperability for the nodes in the transport network (road sections like bridges, tunnels, and areas of highway). In their analysis, that inoperability varied from about 15 percent for a mild disruption to 85 percent after a typhoon evacuation, when traffic is mostly emergency situation workers and late evacuees. “This is when bridge-tunnels are operating at a lowered capability due to minimized speed limitations and need,” says Tatar.
A serious situation, the period instantly after a hurricane, led to the greatest losses of roughly $250 million in a single day. This is because of the high level of inoperability (85 percent).
The mild hold-up (3 hours) cost $8 million and the infrequent however serious traffic hold-up (6 hours) cost $12 million.
The analysis thought about the economic losses experienced by 10 different sectors, from wholesale trade to state and city governments. The sectors that suffered the greatest economic losses were typically those that contribute more to the GDP, for example, the state and city government sector. In regards to the effect of inoperability, the sector impacted most was computer system systems design and related services..
” Calculating the economic impact of disruptive circumstances will enhance threat interaction for the public,” states Tatar. “Although we applied our methods to a transport network, they can be utilized to evaluate a range of networked infrastructure systems, consisting of electrical power grids, oil and gas pipelines, and supply chains.”
.

Researchers are progressively modeling critical facilities systems as computer system networks due to the fact that of the interconnections between facilities (such as energy, transportation, and communication). For their analysis, Tatar and his colleagues integrated Functional Dependency Network Analysis (FDNA) with Dynamic Inoperability Input-Output Models (DIIM) to evaluate the extent to which disruptions to important infrastructure could deteriorate its performance over a duration of time.
Each scenario develops a various level of inoperability for the nodes in the transportation network (road sections like bridges, tunnels, and sections of highway). In their analysis, that inoperability ranged from about 15 percent for a moderate disruption to 85 percent after a cyclone evacuation, when traffic is mostly emergency personnel and late evacuees.