May 3, 2024

Is the Underground Lake on Mars Just Volcanic Rock?

The Martian lake hypothesis dates back to 2018 when a team of researchers published a paper presenting information from the MARSIS (Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionosphere Sounding) instrument on the ESAs Mars Express orbiter. The information revealed a highly-reflective surface under the South Polar Layered Deposits (SPLD). In that paper, the researchers concluded that water was accountable for the signal and the Mars lake hypothesis collected steam.
Other researchers released other documents giving various descriptions for the signal, revealing how minerals and clays might be accountable. Then MARSIS information showed more reflective locations which scientists analyzed as more subsurface lakes. Recently the authors responsible for the 2018 paper that began everything released a research study letter re-affirming their original analysis of the data and refuting research study that reached different conclusions.
Now a group of scientists released a paper stating the other scientists have it wrong. They conclude that volcanic rock is accountable for the MARSIS signal.
The title of their paper is “The Basal Detectability of an Ice-Covered Mars by MARSIS.” The journal Geophysical Research Letters published the paper, and the lead author is Cyril Grima, a planetary researcher at the University of Texas Institute for Geophysics (UTIG).
The hypothesis that theres water under the SPLD relies on a couple of facts. The water needs to be briny to resist freezing, and the temperature cant be too low. The temperature level is crucial since different materials display different permittivity at different temperature levels.
This is a map of the SPLD density, based on MARSIS measurements and MOLA surface area topography. Image Credit: Plaut et al. 2007.
But this paper sets a few of those concerns aside.
” For water to be sustained this close to the surface area, you require both a really salted environment and a strong, in your area created heat source, but that doesnt match what we know of this region,” lead author Cyril Grima stated in a press release.
Rather than clays, salt water, or minerals, this new research suggests that a kind of volcanic rock thats fairly common on Mars is accountable for the MARSIS information. If a few of that volcanic rock were buried under the ice in the SPLD, then it would appear intense like water when MARSIS observed it.
In the research study, Grima and his co-authors used computer system models to add a global sheet of ice onto the Martian surface area. This simulated one-mile-thick ice sheet permitted the scientists to compare functions all across Mars surface with those under the genuine ice at the south pole. The SPLD has to do with 10% impure, and the group duplicated that in their simulated ice.
The outcome?
A radar map of Mars as translucented a mile of ice. UT Austin planetary researcher, Cyril Grima, developed a computer system model to cover the Red Planet in ice and observed how it altered the radar information. This triggered volcanic plains (seen in red) to reflect radar in a manner that looked like liquid water. The finding challenges a 2018 study that appeared to discover liquid water under Mars south polar cap. Credit: Cyril Grima
The team discovered brilliant reflections like those under the SPLD scattered throughout various latitudes. Numerous of them compared with known places of volcanic rock. In general they discovered that in between 0.3% and 2.0% of Mars surface area could produce the very same MARSIS signal identified under the SPLD. The intense surfaces the team discovered in their research study are “… collected within volcanic constructs of diverse geologic date,” the paper states.
Not all of Mars recognized volcanic surfaces produce the exact same signal. Some noticable volcanic features like guard volcanoes produced strong reflections. “A broad area of strong reflections is determined East of the Uranius Tholus translated as a guard volcano arising from gushing eruptions of low viscosity lavas throughout the Hesperian-Amazonian shift,” the authors write.
The research study showed a strong connection between known volcanic areas and reflectivity. This image reveals the Uranius Tholus shield volcano in yellow.
Theres a fascinating clinical debate playing out today over the possible water under the SPLD. These outcomes will not end that dispute, however they contribute. “It draws attention that the brightest terrains across the planet would produce basal echoes with a radiometric character in the variety of the brightest ones observed at the SPLD by Orosei et al. ( 2018) and under similar presumptions for the composition of the overlying ice.” (Note: Orosei et al. 2018 is the initial study presenting evidence for liquid water under the SPLD.).
” This radiometric similarity (or continuity) is indicative of the probability for a non-wet generic product presently readily available at Mars to be accountable for the bright basal SPLD reflection,” the papers conclusion says. The non-wet product is an iron-rich volcanic rock thats common in the world, too.
What do scientists on the other side of this concern think?
Dr. David Stillman is a geophysicist at the Southwest Research Institute (SwRI.) Hes a co-author of papers in assistance of the liquid water hypothesis.
He informed Universe Today that Grima et al. is a robust research study. “The Grima paper is great,” Dr. Stillman said. However he determines some prospective inconsistencies if we can call them that, and points them out.
” His paper makes the presumption that surface area MARSIS amplitudes can be compared despite the fact that they were processed onboard Mars Express when Mars magnetosphere was differing. The reflectivity data used by the Italian group (Orosei et al. 2018) was not processed onboard so that amplitudes might be compared when Mars magnetosphere was varying (another issue with assumptions).” Dr. Stillman is referring to assumptions about Mars that all researchers have to make when studying the world. In specific, scientists must work with presumptions about the subsurface temperature level under the SPLD. The temperature affects the reflectivity of different substances, changing the MARSIS signal.
Grima and his co-authors used a figure to provide some of their findings in their paper. It highlights four areas on the surface of Mars that show high reflectivity under the simulated ice sheet and demonstrates how volcanic rock can represent the signal.
This figure from the research study shows the relative basal echo strength of Mars if the surface was totally covered by a 1.4-km unclean ice sheet (10% volume impurity rate). Bottom inserts show just favorable values for much better recognitions relative to the regional landforms. Image Credit: Grima et al. 2022.
According to Grima et al., the truth that these 4 regions are spread across longitudes is a substantial strength in their outcomes. “Four insets in Figure 3 emphasize a few of those regions where a positive Pss/Ps signature corresponds throughout longitudes instead of simply being confined in your area along an orbit (an indicator of possible information problem),” the paper states.
However Dr. Stillman stated theres another possibility for those signals.
” Additionally, if you look at Fig 3 of Grimas paper you will see very high surface area reflection in the northern plains of Mars that likely does not have huge lava flows, however are due to artifacts due to the onboard processing,” he stated.
” All those arrows indicate high reflectivity that is most likely simply artifacts as the bulk of these are in what we think are sediments and could not have high dielectric values or reflectivity,” Stillman pointed out. “Solis Planum also has pretty random high values, does this indicate the entire thing has a high reflectivity or much like 10% of it?”.
This will not be completion of the dispute, but it does reveal how elaborate the problem is.
This concern is crucial to lots of in the planetary science community. Tightly-knitted community if you scan the internet you can see it gets lots of attention and lots of commentary from other researchers even though Martian polar scientists form a relatively little.
The coloured dots in this image represent sites where the ESAs Mars Express Orbiter found bright radar reflections at Mars south polar cap. Some scientists analyze the reflections as subsurface liquid water, but other scientists have different explanations. Credits: ESA/NASA/JPL-Caltech.
Isaac Smith is a Mars geophysicist at York University whos not associated with any of these research studies. In a press release, Smith explained that the highly reflective signal might be explained by a type of clay dissolved in water. This phenomenon exists on Earth and could be on Mars, too.
Smith likewise mentions that if Grima is right about the reflective signal, its not all bad when it pertains to the larger problem of Martian water.
” I believe the beauty of Grimas finding is that while it tears down the idea there may be liquid water under the planets south pole today, it also gives us really accurate places to go try to find proof of ancient lakes and riverbeds and test hypotheses about the broader drying out of Mars climate over billions of years,” Smith stated.
Were in a position in between contending hypotheses. But were not stuck. This is how science works.
” Science isnt sure-fire on the first shot,” said Smith. “Thats particularly true in planetary science where were taking a look at places nobodys ever checked out and depending on instruments that notice everything from another location.”.
Dr. Stillman appears to concur and points out that everyone is forced to make some assumptions when it pertains to Mars.
” Honestly, I do not know which assumptions are appropriate since we are studying a planet up until now away with extremely limited data,” he told Universe Today.
None of the documents published up until now proves theres water, and none prove there isnt. Rather, were inching our method towards understanding for sure.
We require better information, which means we require another objective to Mars.
Thats never a bad thing.
More:.

Some say remote noticing from the Mars Express orbiter reveals liquid water in an underground lake at Mars south polar region. The Martian lake hypothesis dates back to 2018 when a group of scientists released a paper presenting data from the MARSIS (Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionosphere Sounding) instrument on the ESAs Mars Express orbiter. In that paper, the researchers concluded that water was accountable for the signal and the Mars lake hypothesis gathered steam.
” His paper makes the presumption that surface area MARSIS amplitudes can be compared even though they were processed onboard Mars Express when Mars magnetosphere was differing. The coloured dots in this image represent websites where the ESAs Mars Express Orbiter found intense radar reflections at Mars south polar cap.

Is Mars home to an undersea lake? Various researchers are reaching different conclusions. Some state remote sensing from the Mars Express orbiter shows liquid water in an underground lake at Mars south polar region. Other scientists say minerals or clays discuss the information better.
Whos right? Maybe none of them.
A new research study says that volcanic rock can explain the Mars Express information and that its a more plausible description.

Like this: Like Loading …