” Our research study has actually revealed that realities and lies can sound similarly possible as long as lie tellers are offered a good opportunity to believe what to state. Lies sounded less possible than facts in our experiment, especially when the interviewees likewise had to bring out a secondary job and were told that this job was important.”
Reality tellers were instructed to report their real opinions whereas lie tellers were advised to lie about their viewpoints throughout the interviews.
Professor Vrij stated: “The pattern of results recommends that the introduction of secondary tasks in an interview might assist in lie detection however such jobs require to be presented carefully. It seems that a secondary job will just be efficient if lie tellers do not overlook it.
In this experiment, the secondary task utilized was to remember a seven-digit car registration number. The secondary job was only found to be effective if lie tellers were led to believe that it was essential.
” Our research study has shown that facts and lies can sound equally possible as long as lie tellers are provided a good opportunity to believe what to say. When the chance to think becomes less, realities often sound more plausible than lies.”
— Professor Aldert Vrij, Professor in Psychology
Teacher Aldert Vrij, from the Department of Psychology at the University of Portsmouth, who created the experiment said: “In the last 15 years we have revealed that lies can be found by outsmarting lie tellers. We showed that this can be done by requiring lie tellers to divide their attention in between developing a declaration and a secondary job.
” Our research study has actually revealed that realities and lies can sound equally plausible as long as lie tellers are provided an excellent opportunity to believe what to state. When the chance to think ends up being less, truths often sound more plausible than lies. Lies sounded less possible than facts in our experiment, particularly when the interviewees likewise needed to perform a secondary job and were told that this task was crucial.”
The 164 participants in the experiment were first asked to provide their levels of assistance or opposition about different social subjects that remained in the news. They were then randomly designated to a truth or lie condition and talked to about the 3 topics that they felt most highly about. Reality tellers were advised to report their true viewpoints whereas lie tellers were instructed to lie about their opinions during the interviews.
” The pattern of results recommends that the intro of secondary jobs in an interview might facilitate lie detection however such tasks need to be introduced thoroughly.”
— Professor Aldert Vrij, Professor in Psychology
Those doing the secondary task were given a seven-digit automobile registration number and instructed to remember it back to the job interviewer. Half of them got additional guidelines that if they could not remember the car registration number during the interview, they might be asked to document their viewpoints after the interview.
Participants were provided the opportunity to prepare themselves for the interview and were told it was essential to come across as convincingly as possible throughout the interviews– which was incentivized by being participated in a prize draw.
The results exposed that lie tellers stories sounded less possible and less clear than fact tellers stories, particularly when lie tellers were given the secondary task and informed that it was very important.
Professor Vrij stated: “The pattern of results recommends that the intro of secondary tasks in an interview might help with lie detection but such jobs require to be introduced thoroughly. It appears that a secondary job will just be efficient if lie tellers do not neglect it. This can be accomplished by either telling interviewees that the secondary job is essential, as demonstrated in this experiment, or by presenting a secondary task that can not be neglected (such as gripping a things, holding an item into the air, or driving an automobile simulator). Secondary tasks that do not satisfy these criteria are not likely to assist in lie detection.”
The research was released in the International Journal of Psychology and Behaviour Analysis.
Reference: “The Effects of a Secondary Task on True and False Opinion Statements” by Aldert Vrij, Haneen Deeb, Sharon Leal and Ronald P. Fisher, 28 March 2022, International Journal of Psychology and Behaviour Analysis.DOI: 10.15344/ 2455-3867/2022/ 185.
According to brand-new research, it is much easier to find that somebody is lying if the suspect is made to perform a secondary task while being questioned.
According to an experiment, detectives who asked a suspect to bring out an extra, secondary, job while being questioned were more most likely to expose phonies.
A brand-new approach of lie detection shows that lie-tellers who are made to multitask while being interviewed are simpler to detect.
It has been clearly developed that lying throughout interviews takes in more cognitive energy than telling the truth. Now, a brand-new study by the University of Portsmouth has actually found that private investigators who utilized this knowledge to their benefit by asking a suspect to bring out an extra, secondary, job while being questioned were more most likely to expose phonies. The additional brain power needed to focus on a secondary job (aside from lying) was especially challenging for lie-tellers.
