November 22, 2024

57% of Species: Startling Numbers of Small Mammals Are “Plastic Positive”

Emily Thrift, a graduate of the University of Sussex, says “Its extremely stressing that the traces of plastic were so commonly distributed across places and types of various dietary routines. Prof. Fiona Mathews adds, “We truly need to get a much deeper understanding of the implications of plastic ingestion on land mammals– and the possible impacts this has on their preservation status. In our study, droppings from European hedgehogs carried the greatest amount of plastic polymers. Andy Bool, CEO of the Mammal Society states, “The Mammal Society is proud to have actually helped and part-funded this research as it represents an important step into the study of the impact of plastics on terrestrial mammals. We should alter our relationship with plastic completely; moving away from non reusable products and moving towards changing plastic for better alternatives and developing really circular economies.”

Fiona Mathews, Professor of Environmental Biology at the University of Sussex, states, “Much is learnt about the impact of plastic on aquatic environments, but extremely little is learnt about the very same with terrestrial systems. By analysing the droppings of some of our most extensive small mammals, weve had the ability to offer a glimpse of the prospective impact plastic is having on our wildlife– and the most typically found plastics leaking into our environment.”
Graduate Emily Thrift, Professor Fiona Mathews, Dr. Frazer Coomber, and the Mammal Society, together with Dr. Adam Porter and Prof. Tamara Galloway of the University of Exeter, wrote the paper. It recognizes plastic polymers in 4 of the seven species for which they obtained fecal samples. The brown rat, field vole, wood mouse, and European hedgehog were all found to be plastic favorable.
Researchers found that plastic consumption was happening across locations and throughout different dietary practices, from insectivores, omnivores, and herbivores, contrary to their expectations that samples from city locations would have higher plastic concentrations and samples from herbivorous types would have lower plastic concentrations.
Emily Thrift, a graduate of the University of Sussex, says “Its really fretting that the traces of plastic were so extensively dispersed throughout places and types of various dietary routines. This suggests that plastics might be permeating into all locations of our environment in different ways. Were likewise worried that the European hedgehog and field vole are both types suffering declines in numbers in the UK.”
Using devices at the Greenpeace laboratories at the University of Exeter, the group evaluated 261 fecal samples, with 16.5% including plastic. The most common types identified were polyester, polyethylene (widely utilized in single-use product packaging), and polynorbornene (used mainly in the rubber market). Polyester represented 27% of the pieces determined and was found in all the plastic positive types, other than the wood mouse. Extensively used in textiles and the style market, the paper explains that microfibres can get in the wastewater system through home cleaning and subsequently end up on the land through the usage of sewage sludge as fertilizer.
Over a quarter of the plastics found in the research study were also biodegradable or bioplastics. The authors warn that while these kinds of plastics might break down faster than polymers, they can still be ingested by little mammals and additional research is required to investigate their real biological impacts.
The authors believe that the microplastics discovered in the study are most likely to have gone into species guts as a result of the consumption of contaminated victim or through direct intake. With intake, scientists believe species could be mistaking plastics for food or chewing macroplastics utilized as nesting material or to escape entanglement.
The potential impact of plastics on the food chain is another issue the authors are concerned about, and advising additional research study into.
Prof. Fiona Mathews includes, “We actually need to get a much deeper understanding of the ramifications of plastic intake on land mammals– and the potential impacts this has on their preservation status. In our research study, droppings from European hedgehogs brought the greatest amount of plastic polymers. As a species, they are already in decline in the UK for factors that are mainly unidentified, and they are categorized as Vulnerable to Extinction on the IUCN-compliant local Red List.”
He continues, “European hedgehogs take in earthworms and previous studies have actually found these to include microplastics. So we actually need more research to develop the scale and path of direct exposure more specifically, and to examine frequency in predatory species that consume small mammals, so that we can take appropriate actions to try to protect our declining wildlife from plastics.”
Andy Bool, CEO of the Mammal Society states, “The Mammal Society is proud to have helped and part-funded this research as it represents an important step into the research study of the impact of plastics on terrestrial mammals. With a variety of small mammal types experiencing stressing decreases in numbers it highlights one of the difficulties they face. We can all make a difference to assist protect them from this hazard by reducing the amount of single-use plastic we utilize and recycling and recycling what we do use properly.”
Dr. Adam Porter, NERC Post-Doctoral Research Fellow at the University of Exeter says, “In the UK, plastic contamination can typically appear like a problem someplace else when most images are of contaminated shorelines of tropical landscapes, or charismatic organisms like turtles or sea lions. This study brings the focus home, into our lands and in a few of our much-beloved mammal species. Further, it demonstrates that the quantity of plastic waste we produce is having an impact. We should alter our relationship with plastic entirely; moving far from non reusable products and moving towards changing plastic for much better options and developing truly circular economies.”
Recommendation: “Ingestion of plastics by terrestrial little mammals” by Emily Thrift, Adam Porter, Tamara S. Galloway, Frazer G. Coomber and Fiona Mathews, 24 June 2022, Science of The Total Environment.DOI: 10.1016/ j.scitotenv.2022.156679.
The study was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council, The Mammal Society, the Universitys Fund for Animal Welfare (UFAW), and the Jubilee Trust.

A new research study reveals the effect of microplastics on small mammals.
Over half of the types examined had traces of plastic in their excrement, according to scientists checking out how much plastic little mammals in England and Wales were exposed to.
Over half of the species whose feces were examined had evidence of plastic in them, according to researchers checking out just how much plastic small mammals in England and Wales were exposed to.
Researchers from the University of Sussex, the Mammal Society, and the University of Exeter claim in a study that was released in Science of the Total Environment that the concentrations of plastic excreted were equal to those found in human studies.