April 26, 2024

Q&A: Why eLife Is Doing Away with Rejections

The Scientist spoke with Pattison about the new publishing model and what he hopes will result from it.The Scientist: Briefly explain for me how the new system will work.Damian PattinsonCourtesy of eLifeDamian Pattinson: For every paper that we evaluate, we will publish a reviewed preprint that is a rerendering of the of the initial preprint on the eLife website. And that is a quick summary of the reviews that offer a description of the strength of proof and also the significance of the research study … Rather than having published in eLife being the main … indication of quality, were replacing that with something which is much more nuanced, which essentially focuses on the actual research itself and highlights the strength of the paper itself.TS: Will it be clearly notated when an examined paper is considered faulty in some way, such that it may have been turned down under the old system?DP: In the evaluations … we have a common vocabulary that we utilize to explain documents. See examples of evaluated preprints already published to the eLife website.

The Scientist spoke with Pattison about the new publishing model and what he hopes will result from it.The Scientist: Briefly describe for me how the brand-new system will work.Damian PattinsonCourtesy of eLifeDamian Pattinson: For every paper that we examine, we will post an evaluated preprint that is a rerendering of the of the original preprint on the eLife website. It will include the peer reviews that weve received and an editorial assessment– were calling it an eLife assessment. And that is a quick summary of the reviews that provide a description of the strength of proof and also the significance of the research … Rather than having actually released in eLife being the primary … indicator of quality, were changing that with something which is much more nuanced, which essentially focuses on the actual research study itself and highlights the strength of the paper itself.TS: Will it be clearly notated when a reviewed paper is thought about defective in some way, such that it might have been rejected under the old system?DP: In the assessments … we have a common vocabulary that we utilize to describe papers. See examples of examined preprints currently posted to the eLife website. And so the eLife model is a method of stating, well, in this new world where research is shared early, what is the finest way in which peer review can be applied?