May 2, 2024

Environmental racism affects people living on military bases and the surrounding communities

These service members were enduring bigotry on a routine basis, in spite of the similarly difficult work they invested in their military training. Even though this military setup was not part of Camp Lejeune at first, it was situated close to it, and black service members likewise experienced harmful exposure.

According to the Department of Defense, there are currently 679 military bases throughout the United States heavily infected with PFAs, a group of hazardous substances commonly called “permanently chemicals.” The source of these hazardous chemicals is using AFFF, a fire suppressant, by military firemens and students. It includes between 50% and 98% PFAS, that makes it extremely detrimental to the environment, as some of these substances take up to a thousand years to break down.

“forever chemicals” are far from being the only toxic agents lurking on military bases.

Ecological bigotry is just an aspect of the higher photo of systemic racism, which need to be relentlessly fought to develop a reasonable society for everybody. The most reliable tools to attain ecological justice include self-education about the disproportionate risks impacting impoverished neighborhoods, supplying a platform for individuals of color impacted by poisonous exposure where they can reveal their viewpoint and propose services to end this phenomenon, and holding companies that create contamination accountable for their unethical activities.

Today, anybody can employ in the military, regardless of their race, yet black people still represent a minority amongst service members. Only 19% of all military personnel are black.

Between 1953 and 1987, roughly one million people experienced serious poisonous exposure on the military base.

Although contamination at Camp Lejeune had actually been occurring considering that 1953, it was just in 1982 that the Marine Corps discovered volatile organic compounds polluting numerous setup websites. Shortly after this unsettling discovery, the perchloroethylene level was found to be 43 times greater than the safe limit, while the trichloroethylene level was 280 times higher than the optimum limit. As for PFAS, their concentration in the environment of Camp Lejeune eclipsed the safe limitation by over 2,450 times..

The population of Jacksonville is roughly 74,313, and half of these individuals inhabit Camp Lejeune. Simply put, 37,156 civilians experience toxic direct exposure, and those living near the military installation. Individuals of color live in close proximity to almost every polluted military base in the United States, which increases their threat of coming to fight with dangerous health issue. To make matters worse, between 2016 and 2020, the military clandestinely burnt more than 20 pounds of AFFF waste, regardless of the lack of clinical evidence that PFAS can be destroyed by incineration.

Even though this military setup was not part of Camp Lejeune at first, it was situated close to it, and black service members also experienced poisonous direct exposure.

In 1941, when the nation was preparing for World War II, the armed force was in desperate need of recruits, however there was a problem– it could not work with black people, as bigotry and discrimination were alive and well at the time. This made it possible for the military to recruit over 20,000 black people to serve as Marines and Sailors in the upcoming dispute.

In the very first state, harmful waste might have been incinerated near Plattsburgh Air Force Base, Hancock Field Air National Guard Base, and Griffiss Air Force Base. These military installations are currently contaminated with PFAS and other hazardous chemicals.

In other words, 37,156 civilians experience hazardous exposure, and those living near the military installation. These military installations are already polluted with PFAS and other toxic chemicals.

Despite the poverty level, black kids are 2 to six times most likely to have a high lead concentration in their blood. If they live near contamination sources, the lead level in their blood will end up being dangerous. The existence of this heavy metal in the body may cause neurotoxicity, kidney damage, and even death. Combating environmental bigotry implies doing what is ethically ideal to decrease the health burden produced by poisonous direct exposure amongst vulnerable communities. Our active participation can ultimately produce safe living conditions for people of color and decrease the diseases they face due to ecological harmful direct exposure.

Image credits: US Postal Service.

Jonathan Sharp is Chief Financial Officer at Environmental Litigation Group, P.C. The law firm, headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, concentrates on poisonous exposure. His main duties are financial analysis and case assessment. By virtue of his experience in assessing and evaluating numerous hazardous exposure cases, Jonathan Sharp has gained important understanding about the effect of hazardous ecological contaminants on human health, the dire scenario of infected military bases, and how everyone can battle environmental bigotry.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, individuals of color deal with a 28% greater health concern than the basic population. Moreover, black families inhale 56% more polluted air than they generate, whereas Latinos breathe in 63% more contamination. Alternatively, white individuals inhale 17% less harmful air than they release. This is a clear, unquestionable example of ecological racism. Currently, there are 170,000 people living at Camp Lejeune, which is still contaminated, although to a lesser level.

Climate modification is also often connected to environmental bigotry. Image via Wiki Commons.

About the Author.

As a consequence of the improper usage and disposal of solvents by military personnel, these installations have also ended up being contaminated with commercial solvents such as perchloroethylene, vinyl trichloroethylene, chloride, and benzene. An excellent example in this regard is Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, North Carolina. Between 1953 and 1987, roughly one million individuals experienced extreme harmful direct exposure on the military base.

The main reasons for environmental racism include the unavailability of cost effective land, poverty, historical discrimination, and lack of political power to combat corporations. As a result, people of color generally have no other choice than to inhabit extremely contaminated areas near military bases and other sources of contamination. While both race and low earnings play an important function in environmental racism, plenty of proof shows that race is typically the most reliable indicator of proximity to contamination than earnings alone..

By virtue of his experience in evaluating and examining hundreds of poisonous direct exposure cases, Jonathan Sharp has actually gained important understanding about the impact of hazardous environmental contaminants on human health, the alarming situation of contaminated military bases, and how everyone can combat environmental bigotry.

Black veterans more likely to become ill due to toxic exposure.

Minority neighborhoods are typically clustered around industrial sites, ports, truck paths, and military bases, all of which are sources of poisonous direct exposure. This phenomenon, which is an example of environmental bigotry, is likewise affecting black active-duty service members.

This dangerous concoction of chemicals was a health risk to anyone who invested more than one month at the military base. As a result of poisonous direct exposure, various veterans, family members, and civilians now struggle with terrible health issue, including lung cancer, Parkinsons illness, ovarian cancer, aplastic anemia, bladder cancer, renal toxicity, and leukemia. Still, it is incredibly crucial to acknowledge the effect of toxic exposure on black service members at Camp Lejeune and neighboring neighborhoods.

Environmental bigotry amongst individuals of color living near polluted military bases.

How we can battle environmental racism.