May 7, 2024

Not What Scientists Thought – What Causes Mudslides and Floods After Wildfires?

Understanding how water accumulates and keeping track of the motion of runoff and streamflow in burn locations assists authorities anticipate when and where these post-wildfire events may occur so they can provide afflicted residents with early warning of flash flooding and particles movement.
A domino effect
Typical understanding has actually long held that loss of greenery throughout a fire leaves the soil susceptible to erosion since the plant roots that hold the soil in place pass away and wither. Researchers, however, have actually long held a different view, that as leaves burn, their waxy covering forms a natural, oily substance on the soils surface. This waxy finish develops a water-repellant layer at or near the surface. Researchers thought this layer prevented the ground from absorbing water, leading to quick water runoff similar to a Slip N Slide that brings mud and particles.
Rainstorms about a year after the Bobcat Fire cleaned mud, rocks, tree branches, and other debris through Monrovia Canyon Park 30 miles northeast of USCs University Park Campus. Credit: Courtesy of City of Monrovia.
New research study published in Nature Communications has called that clinical theory into question.
A watershed finding
Researchers at the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Science, in partnership with scientists from the University of Michigan, the U.S. Geological Survey, and Rutgers University, monitored two damp seasons following the Bobcat Fire, from December 2020 to March 2022. The group concluded that water was, in fact, being absorbed by the scorched ground which contained this waxy coating.
Specifically, the team studied 3 watersheds– locations of land that drain pipes rains and snowmelt into streams and rivers– in Southern Californias San Gabriel Mountains. Two of the watersheds burned throughout the 2020 Bobcat Fire and the other was generally unblemished.
The researchers found that post-wildfire, a significant part of the water circulation in all three watersheds came from water that had actually been absorbed in the ground.
Joshua West, professor of Earth sciences who led the research study at USC Dornsife, said it was no surprise that the flow of water and particles in the burned locations stream was 4 to 10 times higher than the flow in the unburnt areas stream. What he didnt expect was that stormwater had actually penetrated the ground in both of the charred watersheds.
Images of the 2020 Bobcat Fire location suggest soil burn seriousness and the areas the scientists studied. Credit: a- USDA Forest Service; b- A.J. West; d- Pléiades © CNES, Distribution AIRBUSDS, sourced through SkyWatch Space Applications Inc., and USGS 3D Elevation Program.
This finding opposed scientists previous beliefs that little water would be absorbed in the scorched watershed due to the presence of waxy soils.
In the unburnt watershed, however, the scientists discovered that trees soaked up the water as expected, avoiding it from reaching streams.
West and Ph.D. candidate Abra Atwood surmised that, in keeping with the popular idea, increased water in rivers originated from the scorched locations due to the fact that burned trees and plant life might not maintain water in their roots as they usually would, however not from the failure of the soil to soak up water.
The research groups finding that the water-repellant layer does not avoid water from being soaked up into the soil strengthened their hypothesis that the water in streams comes from both rains and groundwater, leading to increased flooding in scorched locations versus unburnt.
Water build-up presents a long-lasting hazard
Recognizing locations that are at high-risk for debris flow and mudslides and accurately predicting the quantity of particles flow following rainfall in burn areas depends on understanding how water infiltrates the soil in various areas and how it adds to the circulation of streams.
The dynamics of water circulation and how water builds up below the surface can substantially impact how rapidly landscapes recuperate after a wildfire. This recovery impacts the stability of hill slopes and assists buffer forests against serious dry spell.
On the flip side, water build-up can add to landslides for up to 4 years after a fire as pressure develops in the soil.
” The underground water accumulation recommends that the potential for landslides extends far beyond the 2 years following the fire, posing a long-lasting issue,” West stated. “The abundance of water saved in areas affected by the Bobcat Fire, for example, might serve as a precursor of future flooding issues in the years to come.”
West is confident that the research studys findings hold crucial information that can be utilized by the USGS to improve burn area monitoring and forecast flooding and mudslides after a wildfire.
Referral: “Importance of subsurface water for hydrological action throughout storms in a post-wildfire bedrock landscape” by Abra Atwood, Madeline Hille, Marin Kristen Clark, Francis Rengers, Dimitrios Ntarlagiannis, Kirk Townsend and A. Joshua West, 29 June 2023, Nature Communications.DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-023-39095-z.
Funding was supplied USC Dornsifes Department of Earth Sciences and the National Science Foundation.

Researchers formerly believed that a waxy layer in scorched soil led to water overflow on the ground. Current discoveries show that burnt terrain can indeed absorb water. Common understanding has actually long held that loss of vegetation during a fire leaves the soil susceptible to disintegration due to the fact that the plant roots that hold the soil in location wither and pass away. Scientists, however, have actually long held a various view, that as leaves burn, their waxy coating forms an organic, oily compound on the soils surface. Scientists thought this layer prevented the ground from taking in water, resulting in rapid water overflow comparable to a Slip N Slide that carries mud and particles.

After the enormous Bobcat Fire in Los Angeles in 2020, scientists studied the post-fire effects on soil and water. They discovered that contrary to previous beliefs, charred soil with a waxy finish, arising from scorched greenery, can absorb water, adding to higher water and particles circulation in streams which can result in increased flooding and landslide risks.
Researchers formerly thought that a waxy layer in scorched soil caused water overflow on the ground. However, current discoveries suggest that burnt surface can undoubtedly absorb water. These insights can aid in making more precise forecasts about flooding and mudslides following a fire.
In 2020, the San Gabriel Mountains in Los Angeles County witnessed one of its most disastrous wildfires, which charred over 115,000 acres and harmed or ruined over 150 structures, blanketing currently pandemic-stressed Angelenos in ash and smoke.
Yet, even after the exhausted firemens finally suppressed popular Bobcat Fire, its consequences posed additional dangers. Such “mega-fires,” progressively prevalent due to climate modification, pave the method for post-fire threats. Rainstorms over these blistered surfaces can lead to flooding, mudslides, and particles flows, worsening the devastation left by the fire.